5:27 p.m.
>>>> "Robert" == Robert Pluim
<rpluim(a)bigfoot.com> writes:
Robert> Raymond Toy writes:
>
> Has anyone tried building XEmacs 21.2.3[89] or later with gcc 2.95 on
> Solaris?
>
> This used to work but I can't do it anymore. It compiles ok but when
> temacs tries to dump, I get an error message from ld.so about some
> number being an unknown section type. (More details available if
> necessary. I didn't save the precise message.) If I can get some
> help, perhaps I can help fix this problem, if it really is a problem.
>
Robert> Does it work if you configure with --pdump? I have a 2.95 built
Robert> version of XEmacs (updated from cvs about 5 seconds ago) with --pdump
Robert> that works fine. <clickety,clickety,build>
Robert> Dumping under the name xemacs
Robert> unexec(): dldump(/space/rpluim/xemacs-obj/src/xemacs): ld.so.1: ./temacs:
fatal: /space/rpluim/xemacs-obj/src/xemacs: unknown dynamic entry: 1879048176
Robert> is what I get if I configure without --pdump, so it looks like that is
Robert> the solution.
My apologies. I missed the --pdump config option. I get something
very much like your error message when I compile without --pdump.
Since pdump is the future (right?), I guess there's no point in fixing
the problem.
Ray
3:55 a.m.
New subject: Solaris and gcc 2.95.2?
>>>> "Ray" == Raymond Toy
<toy(a)rtp.ericsson.se> writes:
>>>> "Robert" == Robert Pluim
<rpluim(a)bigfoot.com> writes:
Robert> Raymond Toy writes:
>>
>> Has anyone tried building XEmacs 21.2.3[89] or later with gcc 2.95 on
>> Solaris?
>>
>> This used to work but I can't do it anymore. It compiles ok but when
>> temacs tries to dump, I get an error message from ld.so about some
>> number being an unknown section type. (More details available if
>> necessary. I didn't save the precise message.) If I can get some
>> help, perhaps I can help fix this problem, if it really is a problem.
>>
Robert> Does it work if you configure with --pdump? I have a 2.95 built
Robert> version of XEmacs (updated from cvs about 5 seconds ago) with --pdump
Robert> that works fine. <clickety,clickety,build>
Robert> Dumping under the name xemacs
Robert> unexec(): dldump(/space/rpluim/xemacs-obj/src/xemacs): ld.so.1: ./temacs:
fatal: /space/rpluim/xemacs-obj/src/xemacs: unknown dynamic entry: 1879048176
Robert> is what I get if I configure without --pdump, so it looks like that is
Robert> the solution.
Ray> My apologies. I missed the --pdump config option. I get something
Ray> very much like your error message when I compile without --pdump.
Ray> Since pdump is the future (right?), I guess there's no point in fixing
Ray> the problem.
I'd like to fix such problems, if I can reproduce them.
Raymond and Robert: what do you have in common, to get the crash that
I don't get?
8:44 a.m.
New subject: Solaris and gcc 2.95.2?
Martin Buchholz writes:
Ray> My apologies. I missed the --pdump config option. I get
something
Ray> very much like your error message when I compile without --pdump.
Ray> Since pdump is the future (right?), I guess there's no point in fixing
Ray> the problem.
I'd like to fix such problems, if I can reproduce them.
Raymond and Robert: what do you have in common, to get the crash that
I don't get?
I have no idea. I'm running:
bash-2.02$ gcc -v
Reading specs from /opt/gnu/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.5.1/2.95.2/specs
gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)
Oops. Looks like this is a 2.5.1 gcc (and it uses GNU ld, not the
solaris one, also compiled on 2.5.1), and I'm running:
SunOS dade 5.7 Generic_106541-02 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10
Perhaps I should recompile gcc and binutils on this box, and try again.
FWIW:
bash-2.02$ showrev -a
Hostname: dade
Hostid: 80f964bc
Release: 5.7
Kernel architecture: sun4u
Application architecture: sparc
Hardware provider: Sun_Microsystems
Domain: nortelnetworks.com
Kernel version: SunOS 5.7 Generic 106541-02 December 1998
OpenWindows version:
OpenWindows Version 3.6.1 25 August 1998
Patch: 107063-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWtleux
Patch: 107030-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWkvmx, SUNWkvm
Patch: 106541-02 Obsoletes: 106976-01 Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWkvmx,
SUNWkvm, SUNWcsu, SUNWcsr, SUNWcslx, SUNWcsl, SUNWcarx, SUNWcar, SUNWesu, SUNWarc,
SUNWarcx, SUNWcpr, SUNWcprx, SUNWcsxu, SUNWdpl, SUNWdplx, SUNWesxu, SUNWhea, SUNWtoo,
SUNWtoox
Patch: 107029-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWkvm
Patch: 106793-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWcsu, SUNWhea
Patch: 106832-02 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWcsu, SUNWcsr,
SUNWcarx, SUNWhea
Patch: 106940-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWcsu
Patch: 106950-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWcsu, SUNWcsxu
Patch: 106985-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWcsu, SUNWcsr
Patch: 106987-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWcsu, SUNWsutl
Patch: 107018-01 Obsoletes: Requires: 106938-01 Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWcsu
Patch: 106924-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWcsr, SUNWcarx
Patch: 106944-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWcsr, SUNWcarx
Patch: 106948-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWcsr, SUNWcarx
Patch: 106936-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWcsr
Patch: 107121-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWcsr, SUNWcarx
Patch: 107148-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWcsr, SUNWcarx
Patch: 106963-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWcsr, SUNWcarx
Patch: 106938-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWcslx, SUNWcsl
Patch: 106942-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWcslx, SUNWcsl,
SUNWarc
Patch: 106980-03 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWcslx, SUNWcsl,
SUNWhea
Patch: 107117-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWcslx, SUNWcsl,
SUNWarc
Patch: 106917-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWciu8x, SUNWciu8
Patch: 107147-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWcarx, SUNWcar
Patch: 107081-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWmfrun
Patch: 107059-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWesu, SUNWxcu4
Patch: 107014-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWxilow
Patch: 106934-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWdtbas
Patch: 107094-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWdtbas
Patch: 107178-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWdtbas
Patch: 106946-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWaccu
Patch: 106978-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWadmap
Patch: 107127-02 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWatfsu
Patch: 107001-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWdtdte
Patch: 107022-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWdtdmn
Patch: 107031-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWscpu
Patch: 106949-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWbcp
Patch: 106952-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWbnuu
Patch: 107038-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWdoc
Patch: 107011-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWdtdst
Patch: 107072-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWdtdst
Patch: 106999-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWesxu
Patch: 106982-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWhmd, SUNWhmdx
Patch: 107074-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWinst
Patch: 106146-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWm64w
Patch: 106851-04 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWman
Patch: 106960-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWman
Patch: 106925-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWpd, SUNWpdx
Patch: 107185-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWploc1, SUNWplow1
Patch: 107187-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWploc1, SUNWplow1
Patch: 106812-04 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWplow1
Patch: 107044-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWplow1
Patch: 106879-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWpmowu
Patch: 107171-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWswmt
Patch: 107076-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWvolu, SUNWvolux
Patch: 106147-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWxilvl
Patch: 106926-02 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWudct
Patch: 107209-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWkleu, SUNWkuleu,
SUNWhleu, SUNW5leu
Patch: 106967-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWcleu
Patch: 106969-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWcleu, SUNWgleu
Patch: 106973-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWcleu
Patch: 106915-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWgleu
Patch: 106971-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWgxplt
Patch: 106392-02 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWsmtvr, SUNWsmtvh,
SUNWsmtvt, SUNWsmtvu, SUNWdesmt, SUNWessmt, SUNWfrsmt, SUNWitsmt, SUNWsvsmt, SUNWkosmt,
SUNWcsmt, SUNWhsmt, SUNW5smt, SUNWgsmt, SUNWkusmt
Patch: 107104-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWglrt, SUNWglrtu,
SUNWafbgl, SUNWffbgl
Patch: 107105-01 Obsoletes: Requires: 107104-01 Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWafbgx,
SUNWffbgx, SUNWglrtx
Robert
--
The above are my opinions,
and my opinions only.
9:56 a.m.
New subject: Solaris and gcc 2.95.2?
>>>> "Robert" == Robert Pluim
<rpluim(a)bigfoot.com> writes:
Robert> Oops. Looks like this is a 2.5.1 gcc (and it uses GNU ld, not the
Robert> solaris one, also compiled on 2.5.1), and I'm running:
Running a gcc on a different OS version than it was compiled on is
very bad juju.
I also vaguely recall that using gcc with the GNU linker is bad juju.
I remember having success with the -fno-gnu-linker flag.
1:32 p.m.
New subject: Solaris and gcc 2.95.2?
Martin Buchholz writes:
>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Pluim
<rpluim(a)bigfoot.com> writes:
Robert> Oops. Looks like this is a 2.5.1 gcc (and it uses GNU ld, not the
Robert> solaris one, also compiled on 2.5.1), and I'm running:
Running a gcc on a different OS version than it was compiled on is
very bad juju.
I also vaguely recall that using gcc with the GNU linker is bad juju.
Yes. Forcing gcc to use Solaris ld makes dumping work again. <sigh>
Maybe an entry for the PROBLEMS file?
I remember having success with the -fno-gnu-linker flag.
Hmm, that didn't seem to make any difference.
<rant>
Why the !＠#$ does gcc still insist on using the gnu linker if it can
find it, even though I've configured it with --with-gnu-ld=no
LD=/usr/ccs/bin/ld? Is it morally or philosophically incorrect to wish
to use the vendor tools rather than the gnu ones? I repent, I recant,
GNU tools are the greatest, except in this instance they're _broken_,
and I'd just like to be able to _prove_ that so I can get on with
fixing stuff.
</rant>
Robert
--
The above are my opinions,
and my opinions only.
8719
days inactive
8720
days old
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Martin Buchholz -
Raymond Toy -
Robert Pluim