Re: minibuf.texi question

Tuesday, 21 December 1999

        Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)iskon.hr&gt; writes:

...
 > I think it is a very weird feature for a first time user,
however it
 > also very practical, and it doesn't get in the way. Now that we
 > start passing in the default value anyway for the history stuff, it
 > seems to be "cheap" to implement.

 Do you think the two features could coexist?  I don't see the point of
 our DEFAULT parameter if FSF-style DEFAULT is one M-n away. 
Our style default parameter is about putting the default answer in the
history when you just hit RET. That is totally independent of the
cursor-down feature. Otherwise you would have to say "To get your
prompt in the history type M-n before RET". IMHO that requires too
much foresight on the part of the user.

Jan

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998