Re: Better Installataion file and `describe-installation' under Windows
- First Post
- Replies
- Stats
-
Go to
- ----- 2024 -----
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2013 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2012 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2011 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2010 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2009 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2008 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2007 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2006 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2005 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2004 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2003 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2002 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2001 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2000 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1999 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1998 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
>>>> "Jonathan" == Jonathan Harris
<jhar(a)tardis.ed.ac.uk> writes:
Jonathan> Adrian Aichner wrote:
>
> When I found that xemacs.mak was broken in 21.2-b13 I decided a
> redesign was in order to create a complete Installation file in favor
> of the CONF_REPORT which goes to STDOUT of nmake.
Jonathan> This is certainly nicer than my hack, but unfortunately hangs while
Jonathan> loading lisp\Installation.el during dump for me on Windows 95.
Hi Jonathan,
I probably goofed!
How do I replace CONTROL-Ms with nothing in a way that would not interfere
with MULE either?
How do I do this right?
Installation.el: Installation
＠type > Installation.el <<
(setq Installation-string
(replace-in-string
"
<<NOKEEP
type Installation >> Installation.el
type >> Installation.el <<
"
"CONTROL-M" ""))
<<NOKEEP
I'll devise a new patch if you help me through this.
> ＠＠ -1022,6 +908,18 ＠＠
> $(LIB_SRC)\make-docfile.exe -a $(DOC) -d $(TEMACS_SRC) >
Jonathan>
$(DOC_SRC8)
> $(LIB_SRC)\make-docfile.exe -a $(DOC) -d $(TEMACS_SRC) >
Jonathan> $(DOC_SRC9)
> +Installation.el: Installation
> + ＠type > Installation.el <<
> +(setq Installation-string
> + (replace-in-string
> + "
> +<<NOKEEP
> + type Installation >> Installation.el
> + type >> Installation.el <<
> +"
> + "" ""))
Should be "
" ""))
What did I do wrong? After patching xemacs.mak on Windows 95, do you
still have the C-m above?
Regards,
Adrian
Jonathan> ^^ ^^
Jonathan> This is the problem. (replace-in-string foo "" "")
hangs.
> +<<NOKEEP
> +
> $(LISP)\Installation.el: Installation.el
> copy Installation.el $(LISP)
Jonathan> Jonathan.
Jonathan> --
Jonathan> Jonathan Harris | jhar(a)tardis.ed.ac.uk
Jonathan> London, England | Jonathan.Harris(a)symbian.com
--
Adrian Aichner Teradyne GmbH, European Design Center
Integra Test Division Telephone +49/89/41861(0)-208
Dingolfinger Strasse 2 Fax +49/89/41861-217 (What is a Fax?)
D-81673 MUENCHEN E-mail adrian.aichner(a)teradyne.com
Jonathan Harris
Tuesday, 16 March
Tue, 16 Mar
11:20 p.m.
New subject: Better Installataion file and `describe-installation' under Windows
Adrian Aichner wrote:
[snip]
>> +Installation.el: Installation
>> + ＠type > Installation.el <<
>> +(setq Installation-string
>> + (replace-in-string
>> + "
>> +<<NOKEEP
>> + type Installation >> Installation.el
>> + type >> Installation.el <<
>> +"
>> + "" ""))
Should be "" ""))
What did I do wrong? After patching xemacs.mak on Windows 95, do you
still have the C-m above?
No. The ^M got thrown away by the time your patch got to me. Do you see
the ^M in your patch as it appeared in xemacs-patches? Maybe my mail
client or server discarded the ^M but if not perhaps you should resubmit
with the patch as a binary attachment instead of as inline text. And
lets hope that the cvs server doesn't decide to do something funky with
it too.
Putting the ^M back makes your patch work for me on non-MULE.
Jonathan.
--
Jonathan Harris | jhar(a)tardis.ed.ac.uk
London, England | Jonathan.Harris(a)symbian.com
Kyle Jones
Wednesday, 17 March
Wed, 17 Mar
2:19 a.m.
New subject: Better Installataion file and `describe-installation' under Windows
Jonathan Harris writes:
Adrian Aichner wrote:
> What did I do wrong? After patching xemacs.mak on Windows 95, do you
> still have the C-m above?
No. The ^M got thrown away by the time your patch got to me.
Please write \r in strings to avoid this problem.
9328
days inactive
9329
days old
2 comments
3 participants
tags (0)
participants (3)
-
Adrian Aichner -
Jonathan Harris -
Kyle Jones