Mats Lidell writes: Mats, try evaluating the define-key forms in Alan's message. It's very possible that Aidan's "check for GNU keysym syntax" patch actually *fixed* a bug introduced in an earlier version of the feature. _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta

Ar an deichiú lá de mí na Nollaig, scríobh Stephen J. Turnbull: Right. Cf. the commit message: # HG changeset patch # User Aidan Kehoe <kehoea(a)parhasard.net&gt; # Date 1352241238 0 # Node ID 4d15e903800b152c8f2710467d8e0693dd054570 # Parent be87f507f5100953f14b0405f0ccbd825e941fe7 Be more careful about erroring with probable GNU-syntax keysyms, keymap.c src/ChangeLog addition: 2012-11-06 Aidan Kehoe <kehoea(a)parhasard.net&gt; * keymap.c (define_key_check_and_coerce_keysym): When worrying about GNU Emacs-like keysym syntax, if the symbol name starts with c-whatever (or s-whatever, or m-whatever), check for a function binding for that before erroring. Otherwise command remapping and C mode interact badly, since most of the C mode commands are regarded as GNU Emacs-style keysyms. -- ‘Liston operated so fast that he once accidentally amputated an assistant’s fingers along with a patient’s leg, […] The patient and the assistant both died of sepsis, and a spectator reportedly died of shock, resulting in the only known procedure with a 300% mortality.’ (Atul Gawande, NEJM, 2012) _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta