Re: .emacs vs .xemacs vs .xemacs.el vs...?

Wednesday, 27 May 1998

        ...
>>>> "Jan" == Jan Vroonhof
<vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch&gt; writes: 
Jan> sperber(a)informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]) writes:

...
> If you guys put random stuff in there, I promise something will
break
> eventually.  It does not belong there.  Ever.  Period.  The only way
> to use ~/.xemacs for random init goop would be to put the default
> early package hierarchy somewhere else.  Maybe ~/.xemacs-packages. 
Jan> Why? If site-start can be in lib/xemacs/packages/lisp why can init.el
Jan> not be in .xemacs/lisp?

site-start can be *anywhere* in the load-path, and it follows the
usual rules for vanilla Elisp files.  init.el is (the way the current
proposals are going) getting hard-coded at ~/.xemacs or
~/.xemacs/lisp.

-- 
Cheers =8-} Chipsy
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998