Re: symbol->obarray and Vpure_uninterned_symbol_table

Thursday, 22 April 1999

        Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr&gt; writes:

...
 Since we no longer have pure space, Vpure_uninterned_symbol_table is
 no longer needed. 
Sorry, but isn't this still needed? We do not have pure space now but
isn't that temporary? If the portable dumper is ready don't we have
read-only objects again and thus the need for
Vpure_uninterned_symbol_table or generalized equivalent to store the
symbols these read-only objects refer to?

Jan

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998