- First Post
- Replies
- Stats
-
Go to
- ----- 2024 -----
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2013 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2012 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2011 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2010 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2009 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2008 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2007 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2006 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2005 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2004 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2003 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2002 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2001 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2000 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1999 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1998 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
[should 'make check' build first?]
But I rarely do "make all", I usually do "make
beta" or "make
src/xemacs" or "make src/xemacs.dmp".
Fair enough. But maybe the 'check' target could be split into
'check', which will build xemacs first if necessary, and some
other target ('test'?) which won't.
--
Ed Avis <avised(a)kbcfp.com>
Valdis Kl=?iso8859-4?Q?=BA?=tnieks
Friday, 24 October
Fri, 24 Oct
5:17 p.m.
New subject: 'make check' lacking dependencies
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 17:04:45 BST, "Avis, Ed" said:
Fair enough. But maybe the 'check' target could be split
into
'check', which will build xemacs first if necessary, and some
other target ('test'?) which won't.
I'm failing to see the point of a check/test/etc target that fails to make sure
that what the test is running against is up to date. It *might* make sense if
the lib-src/ directory had its own 'make check' since that code doesn't
require
an xemacs.
Under what conditions would you want a 'make check' that *didnt* have a
dependency to force an up-to-date xemacs?
Sunday, 26 October
Sun, 26 Oct
6:08 a.m.
New subject: 'make check' lacking dependencies
>>>> "Valdis" == Valdis Kletnieks
<Valdis.Kletnieks(a)vt.edu> writes:
Valdis> Under what conditions would you want a 'make check' that
Valdis> *didnt* have a dependency to force an up-to-date xemacs?
When you're working on the test suite, for one.
In general, if you want to compare the current behavior with behavior
after a patch (which you may have already begun work on).
--
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
7698
days inactive
7700
days old
2 comments
3 participants
tags (0)
participants (3)
-
Avis, Ed -
Stephen J. Turnbull -
Valdis Kl=?iso8859-4?Q?=BA?=tnieks