- First Post
- Replies
- Stats
-
Go to
- ----- 2024 -----
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2013 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2012 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2011 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2010 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2009 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2008 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2007 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2006 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2005 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2004 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2003 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2002 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2001 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2000 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1999 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1998 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
>>>> "Yoshiki" == Yoshiki Hayashi
<yoshiki(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Yoshiki> Adrian Aichner <adrian(a)xemacs.org> writes:
> I intend to review following patch on the weekend.
> First perusal a few days ago looked promising.
>
> What about ps-print relative to MULE. Are there any opne issues with that?
>
> I intend to compare this to
> os/ps-print-nomule.
Yoshiki> AFAIK, there was no progress from
Yoshiki> http://www.xemacs.org/list-archives/xemacs-beta/200002/msg00376.html
Yoshiki> Thanks for the reminder. I'll test MULE print stuff later
Yoshiki> and perhaps synch it to FSF Emacs 20.7.
Hello Yoshiki, hello Stephen,
1999-12-29 "Kevin Delia" <Kevin.Delia(a)globalone.net>
Fix for ps-print.el used by NT XEmacs
<386A47EC.DCFBB7B7(a)globalone.net>
http://www.xemacs.org/list-archives/xemacs-patches/199912/msg00158.html
is newer than
emacs-20.7/lisp/ps-print.el
It has mule support commented out.
emacs-20.7/lisp/ps-mule.el
still uses
"string-as-{multi,uni}byte"
as Stephen reported for earlier versions.
I would like to sync up our ps-print-nomule/ps-print.el with
http://www.xemacs.org/list-archives/xemacs-patches/199912/msg00158.html
Can you or Stephen take care of ps-mule.el?
Stephen, Steve, Yoshiki:
What packaging route should we take regarding
ps-print-nomule
vs.
ps-print-mule
vs.
ps-print
Best regards,
Adrian
Yoshiki> --
Yoshiki> Yoshiki Hayashi
--
Adrian Aichner
mailto:adrian＠xemacs.org
http://www.xemacs.org
Adrian Aichner
Monday, 13 November
Mon, 13 Nov
3:12 p.m.
New subject: Patch queue status
>>>> "APA" == Adrian Aichner
<adrian(a)xemacs.org> writes:
>>>> "Yoshiki" == Yoshiki Hayashi
<yoshiki(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Yoshiki> Adrian Aichner
<adrian(a)xemacs.org> writes:
>> I intend to review following patch on the weekend.
>> First perusal a few days ago looked promising.
>>
>> What about ps-print relative to MULE. Are there any opne issues with that?
>>
>> I intend to compare this to
>> os/ps-print-nomule.
Yoshiki> AFAIK, there was no progress from
Yoshiki> http://www.xemacs.org/list-archives/xemacs-beta/200002/msg00376.html
Yoshiki> Thanks for the reminder. I'll test MULE print stuff later
Yoshiki> and perhaps synch it to FSF Emacs 20.7.
APA> Hello Yoshiki, hello Stephen,
APA> 1999-12-29 "Kevin Delia" <Kevin.Delia(a)globalone.net>
APA> Fix for ps-print.el used by NT XEmacs
APA> <386A47EC.DCFBB7B7(a)globalone.net>
APA> http://www.xemacs.org/list-archives/xemacs-patches/199912/msg00158.html
APA> is newer than
APA> emacs-20.7/lisp/ps-print.el
APA> It has mule support commented out.
I have reviewed the diffs between emacs-20.7/lisp/ps-print.el and
http://www.xemacs.org/list-archives/xemacs-patches/199912/msg00158.html
and they all look reasonable.
I intend to merge
http://www.xemacs.org/list-archives/xemacs-patches/199912/msg00158.html
into
ps-print-nomule/ps-print.el
tonight.
Please advise,
Adrian
APA> emacs-20.7/lisp/ps-mule.el
APA> still uses
APA> "string-as-{multi,uni}byte"
APA> as Stephen reported for earlier versions.
APA> I would like to sync up our ps-print-nomule/ps-print.el with
APA> http://www.xemacs.org/list-archives/xemacs-patches/199912/msg00158.html
APA> Can you or Stephen take care of ps-mule.el?
APA> Stephen, Steve, Yoshiki:
APA> What packaging route should we take regarding
APA> ps-print-nomule
APA> vs.
APA> ps-print-mule
APA> vs.
APA> ps-print
APA> Best regards,
APA> Adrian
Yoshiki> --
Yoshiki> Yoshiki Hayashi
APA> --
APA> Adrian Aichner
APA> mailto:adrian＠xemacs.org
APA> http://www.xemacs.org
--
Adrian Aichner
mailto:adrian＠xemacs.org
http://www.xemacs.org
* "APA" == Adrian Aichner <adrian(a)xemacs.org> writes:
APA> What packaging route should we take regarding
APA> ps-print-nomule
APA> vs.
APA> ps-print-mule
APA> vs.
APA> ps-print
How about...
- rename the package ps-print-nomule to ps-print
- ps-print.el is turned into a wrapper kind of thing:
(if (featurep 'mule)
(require 'ps-print-mule)
(require 'ps-print-nomule))
- ps-print-mule.el becomes the Mule equiv of the old
ps-print.el
- ps-print-nomule.el becomes the non-Mule equiv of old
ps-print.el
Just a thought, what do you think?
--
|---<Regards, Steve Youngs>-----------[GnuPG KeyID: 59E4C4B2]---|
| XEmacs - It's not just an editor... |
| It's a way of life. |
|----------------------------------<mailto:youngs＠xemacs.org>---|
8775
days inactive
8776
days old
2 comments
2 participants
tags (0)
participants (2)
-
Adrian Aichner -
Steve Youngs