When I checked out CVS this morning (~ 11:30 -0400 UTC), the latest cvs
(coming from the server as 21.5.b13) still had a version.sh showing 21.5.b12
(+CVS20030509). However, the Changelog has an entry from Steve Youngs dated
2003-05-10. Am I getting the correct recent CVS? BTW, I am back to having
to compile with the -g flag to gcc to get past the redump at update-elc-2.el
--
Dr. Robert Delius Royar Associate Professor of English
Morehead State University Morehead, Kentucky
Kill UGLY Corporate Radio
Writing is the hardest work in the world not involving heavy lifting.
-Peter Hamill
Show replies by date
|--==> "rdr" == robert delius royar <xemacs(a)frinabulax.org> writes:
rdr> When I checked out CVS this morning (~ 11:30 -0400 UTC), the latest cvs
rdr> (coming from the server as 21.5.b13) still had a version.sh showing 21.5.b12
rdr> (+CVS20030509).
If version.sh states "21.5.12" what makes you think it was 21.5.13?
rdr> However, the Changelog has an entry from Steve Youngs dated
rdr> 2003-05-10. Am I getting the correct recent CVS?
Yep. I'm in Australia and hence ahead of the rest of the world [1]
and so it is quite possible for me to have entered what you may see as
"post-dated" ChangeLog entries. No big deal.
Footnotes:
[1] Read into that what you will. :-P
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 10D5C9C5>---|
| XEmacs - The only _______ you'll ever need. |
| Fill in the blank, yes, it's THAT good! |
|------------------------------------<youngs(a)xemacs.org>---|