Ar an chéad lá de mí Bealtaine, scríobh David Jacobson: > I'm not 100% sure, but it looks like it was 21.4.19. I found this string > in the core file, > > \xemacs-21.4.19 > > 21.4.19 is not the default here, but we can get it by typing the full > path, and I often do. So, bottom line, it looks like I was running > xemacs 21.4.19. Okay. On various old Sun systems, howver, the function we call to fix the bug isn’t available in the X libraries; can I ask you to do a readelf -s `which xemacs-21.4.19` | grep XtRegisterDrawable or the equivalent with Sun tools? If it gives a result, then we have a new problem. > Aidan Kehoe wrote On 05/01/06 00:10,: > > > Ar an ceathrú lá is fiche de mí Aibréan, scríobh David Jacobson: > > > > > One of the last things I had done before leaving for vacation was to > > > paste a gigantic bunch of stuff copyed from acroread. (This was > > > probably 10 or 15 pages of text. I suspect not all of it successfully > > > pasted.) > > > >Incremental selection transfer (which gigantic pastes will tend to use) > >was broken from 1997-2005. Are you using an XEmacs 21.4 older than > >21.4.18, or a 21.5 older than 21.5.20? If so, we’ve fixed this bug > >already.