I've given the `cond' special form the r{4,5}rs scheme-style `=>' syntax. It's working, when the test code is run interpreted, but not when run byte-compiled. Attached is the simple test code followed by my first C code patch to XEmacs. (not counting typos in docstrings or comments.) My question is: Should the byte compiler be compiling `cond' like that, since it's in C already? Wouldn't it run faster if it only translated things like the anonymous lambda, and left the rest for the C code to run? #include <nerdy/any_ideas.h> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: cond-test.el cond-test.el Type: unspecified type (application/octet-stream) Encoding: 8bit ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1998-04-27 Karl M. Hegbloom <karlheg(a)inetarena.com&gt; * eval.c (Fcond): Support scheme-style `=>' syntax. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: eval.c.diff eval.c.diff Type: unspecified type (application/octet-stream) Encoding: 8bit