Re: The plague is back: "Attempt to delete the sole visible or iconified frame" strikes again
- First Post
- Replies
- Stats
-
Go to
- ----- 2024 -----
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2013 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2012 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2011 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2010 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2009 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2008 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2007 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2006 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2005 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2004 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2003 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2002 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2001 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2000 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1999 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1998 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
"James N. Potts" <jnpotts(a)plutonium.net> writes:
>Can you also reproduce this with frames created by C-x 5 2 ?,
i.e.
>
>C-x 5 2
>C-x 5 o (little ooo)
>minimize other frame
>C-x 5 0 (zero)
Yes.
Well there is two options
1. The mimized state is considered a form of iconized (which I
believe it is). Then this an XEmacs-NT bug.
2. The allow-deletion-of-last-visible-frame = nil feature doesn't
work on NT and should be changed to t.
Jan
Andy Piper
Tuesday, 20 July
Tue, 20 Jul
8:57 a.m.
New subject: The plague is back: "Attempt to delete the sole visible or iconified frame" strikes again
At 08:16 PM 7/19/99 +0200, Jan Vroonhof wrote:
"James N. Potts" <jnpotts(a)plutonium.net> writes:
> >Can you also reproduce this with frames created by C-x 5 2 ?, i.e.
> >
> >C-x 5 2
> >C-x 5 o (little ooo)
> >minimize other frame
> >C-x 5 0 (zero)
>
>
> Yes.
Well there is two options
1. The mimized state is considered a form of iconized (which I
believe it is). Then this an XEmacs-NT bug.
2. The allow-deletion-of-last-visible-frame = nil feature doesn't
work on NT and should be changed to t.
There are some iconic bugs in 21.1 that Phil Aston fixed in 21.2. I don't
know i fthey affect this behaviour.
andy
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Andy Piper
Senior Consultant Architect, BEA Systems Ltd
9258
days inactive
9259
days old
1 comments
2 participants
tags (0)
participants (2)
-
Andy Piper -
Jan Vroonhof