Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch> writes:
Kyle Jones <kyle_jones(a)wonderworks.com> writes:
> And I will help you. We need to mess with more toolkits like we
> need a shotgun blast to the knees. In order to get somewhere you
> have to leave things alone that are already working. We need to
> lose this inferiority complex about ourselves and our code.
Wouldn't it be nice to at least have some dialog code added to 'lwlib' [1]
so that it is possible to have a complete 'motif' look but ditch motif.
Jan
That is one of the things at the top of my list. I have some old code
lying around from when I was learning how to use Xt, and I'll try and
clean it up, make it look spiffy and work with the rest of lwlib.
Other things I wish to do to lwlib are fix the menu redraws and deal
with the pull-right/pull-left gap problem. Anybody else have pet
peeves?
--
Jareth Hein | jareth(a)camelot.co.jp | ハイン ジェラス
Toolsmith & Program lead |
http://www.camelot.co.jp | 開発部チーフ
Camelot Software, Ltd. | |(株)キャメロット
"Contrary to popular belief, penguins are not the salvation of modern
technology. Neither do they throw parties for the urban proletariat."