You're right. I just compared to FSF emacs.
It's displaying differently, but not correctly.
Sorry for the confusion.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Uwe Brauer <oub(a)mat.ucm.es> wrote:
>> "Jeff" == Jeff Sparkes <jsparkes(a)gmail.com>
writes:
> The xemacs-gtk port uses pango to display. It will display Hebrew in
R2L.
> Moving the cursor through the string makes the display a mess
> unfortunately. It's okay for reading, but difficult to edit. You
may
> want to give it a try.
I just compiled with the following options:
./configure '--with-mule' '--with-xim' '--with-xfs'
'--with-optimization' '--without-error-checking'
'--with-toolbars'
'--with-xpm' '--with-xface' '--with-gtk'
And hebrew is not display R2L
I will try without xfs and xim.
Uwe Brauer
--
Jeff Sparkes
jsparkes(a)gmail.com
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta