Re: Yet another SUMO tarball...
- First Post
- Replies
- Stats
-
Go to
- ----- 2024 -----
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2013 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2012 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2011 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2010 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2009 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2008 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2007 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2006 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2005 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2004 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2003 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2002 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2001 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2000 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1999 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1998 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
Jonathan Harris <jhar(a)tardis.ed.ac.uk> writes:
install_dir/XEmacs-21.0/etc
i386-pc-win32 <-- binaries here
info
lisp
lock
site-packages/...
xemacs-packages/...
and ../mule-packages for MULE enabled emacsen.
Instead, XEmacs finds
packages using configure-package-path defined at build time and/or the
EMACSPACKAGEPATH variable defined at runtime.
use to people on Windows who are building from source; the Windows
native binary bundle includes its own version of the sumo bundle.
Does that mean
1. The Windows version is not as easily relocatable as the Unix
version?
2. on Windows NT you basically revert to the old distribution
method, i.e. just include everything?. Why?
Jan
Jonathan Harris
Wednesday, 23 September
Wed, 23 Sep
2:01 p.m.
New subject: Yet another SUMO tarball...
Jan Vroonhof wrote:
Jonathan Harris <jhar(a)tardis.ed.ac.uk> writes:
> install_dir/XEmacs-21.0/etc
> i386-pc-win32 <-- binaries here
> info
> lisp
> lock
> site-packages/...
> xemacs-packages/...
and ../mule-packages for MULE enabled emacsen.
I omiited mule-packages because But XEmacs on Windows doesn't support
MULE (yet).
> Instead, XEmacs finds
> packages using configure-package-path defined at build time and/or the
> EMACSPACKAGEPATH variable defined at runtime.
> use to people on Windows who are building from source; the Windows
> native binary bundle includes its own version of the sumo bundle.
Does that mean
1. The Windows version is not as easily relocatable as the Unix
version?
Yes, unless one lays it out in the same way as the UNIX version.
2. on Windows NT you basically revert to the old distribution
method, i.e. just include everything?. Why?
Windows users are used to a point-and-drool method of installation, so
the binaries, common and packages are wrapped up inside an install
program that installs everything and sets EMACSPACKAGEPATH accordingly.
Jonathan.
--
Jonathan Harris | jhar(a)tardis.ed.ac.uk
London, England | Jonathan.Harris(a)symbian.com
9557
days inactive
9557
days old
1 comments
2 participants
tags (0)
participants (2)
-
Jan Vroonhof -
Jonathan Harris