SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org> writes:
;;; this file uses opcodes which do not exist in Emacs 19.
(if (and (boundp 'emacs-version)
(or (and (boundp 'epoch::version) epoch::version)
(string-lessp emacs-version "20")))
(error "`%s' was compiled for Emacs 20"))
I propose that this become:
;;; this file uses opcodes which do not exist in Emacs 19.
(or (>= emacs-major-version 20)
(error "`%s' was compiled for Emacs 20"))
If the symbol `emacs-major-version' doesn't exist, Emacs cannot load
the file anyway.
Yes, but it will make the error more obscure, which we should try to
avoid.
Ur
cl-emacs-type
=> lucid
Can we make this print "XEmacs" or "xemacs" instead?
It is a symbol internal to the CL package. Someone who wants to
actively work on cl*.el should change `cl-emacs-type' to return
`xemacs' under XEmacs.
The policy has been that etc/NEWS doesn't get rewritten and this
is
in the historical section. Hrvoje, when can we prune the NEWS file
and put the oldest historical stuff in etc/HISTORY?
Maybe we should create ONEWS, the way FSF does?
--
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
If anything goes wrong, blame the random-number generator!