sb> It has been suggested that as mild an improvement in code sb> documentation as adopting full FSF Emacs-style ChangeLogs is hurting sb> XEmacs development. I don't think any patch should patch should be sb> applied to the code base without a ChangeLog entry. I don't know how sb> Richard manages to keep with the minute details of every single patch, sb> but I can't. I can manage in the case of (relatively) simple sb> patches. Large patches are problematic. Steven, Q: What's the question? Can you please re-phrase the actual question? Thanks, Adrian sb> This is a vote, majority wins. Voting ends July 5th at Midnight sb> (US/Pacific daylight time -- -0700). This announcement will not be sb> reposted by me. sb> Send yes votes to <cl-yes(a)vmailer.xemacs.org&gt;, send no votes to sb> <cl-no(a)vmailer.xemacs.org&gt;. sb> Questions to <xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org&gt;. -- Adrian Aichner Applications Engineer Teradyne GmbH Semiconductor Test Group Telephone +49/89/41861(0)-208 Dingolfinger Strasse 2 Fax +49/89/41861-217 D-81673 MUENCHEN E-mail aichner(a)ecf.teradyne.com