Re: [V] Re: patch for adding 'pui-uninteresting-package-face'
- First Post
- Replies
- Stats
-
Go to
- ----- 2024 -----
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2013 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2012 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2011 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2010 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2009 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2008 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2007 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2006 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2005 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2004 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2003 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2002 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2001 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2000 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1999 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1998 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
On Wed, 06 Mar 2002, youngs(a)xemacs.org wrote:
VETO
[Please direct followups to xemacs-beta (Mail-Followup-To: set)]
Hi Jeff!
I like the idea behind this patch, but I think it needs a different
approach.
OK, Please try the following patch (off of 21.4.6 package-ui.el)
This version adds the following customizations:
pui-boring-package-face
pui-up-to-date-package-invisible
pui-uninstalled-package-invisible
pui-boring-package-invisible
pui-boring-packages
Any package listed in pui-boring-packages is boring
I made mule packages boring for non mule emacs. Feel free to change
the defaults.
I give a separate face control for boring as well as separate
invisible control for up-to-date, uninstalled and boring packages.
This lets you completely ignore packages that you've decided are
boring (by setting pui-boring-packages and pui-boring-package-invisible
appropriately).
You can make invisible lines visible and vice-verse by using the new
'b' command. Feel free to change the key binding.
A further idea - Package 'views' could be built on top of this. Example views:
'installed package view' - show installed packages
'all packages view' - show every package
'update package view' - show outdated and uninstalled (but not boring)
packages.
-jeff
Attachments:
- package-ui.patch (application/emacs-lisp — 5.7 KB)
Steve Youngs
Saturday, 9 March
Sat, 9 Mar
9:49 p.m.
New subject: [V] Re: patch for adding 'pui-uninteresting-package-face'
|--==> "JM" == Jeff Mincy <jeff(a)delphioutpost.com> writes:
JM> OK, Please try the following patch (off of 21.4.6 package-ui.el)
Wonderful. Except it doesn't work. :-(
JM> This version adds the following customizations:
JM> pui-boring-package-face
JM> pui-up-to-date-package-invisible
JM> pui-uninstalled-package-invisible
JM> pui-boring-package-invisible
JM> pui-boring-packages
These all sound fine to me.
JM> Any package listed in pui-boring-packages is boring
JM> I made mule packages boring for non mule emacs. Feel free to change
JM> the defaults.
I'd just change it to a negative test (if (not (featurep 'mule))...).
That way, you don't need a "do nothing" form in the test.
JM> You can make invisible lines visible and vice-verse by using the
JM> new 'b' command. Feel free to change the key binding.
I have no strong feelings of this, 'b' is fine. If I was going to
change it, I'd use 'I'.
JM> A further idea - Package 'views' could be built on top of this.
JM> Example views:
JM> 'installed package view' - show installed packages
JM> 'all packages view' - show every package
JM> 'update package view' - show outdated and uninstalled (but not
JM> boring) packages.
Sounds nifty.
JM> + (if (memq pkg-sym pui-boring-packages)
JM> + (list "-" pui-boring-package-face
pui-boring-package-invisible)
JM> + (list "-" pui-uninstalled-package-face
pui-uninstalled-package-invisible)))))
This is where it's failing for me. The
'(if (memq pkg-sym pui-boring-packages)' is always returning nil.
Setting 'pui-up-to-date-package-invisible' works as expected.
Oh and I just thought of a possible annoyance. When a new Mule
package is added to the packages, the default value of
'pui-boring-packages' for non-Mule XEmacsen would no longer hide all
the Mule packages.
Maybe for hiding all the Mule packages, instead of listing them, we
should parse the package-index file and hide anything that has
'category "mule"'. What do you think, Jeff?
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 10D5C9C5>---|
| XEmacs - It's not just an editor. |
| It's a way of life. |
|------------------------------------<youngs(a)xemacs.org>---|
8295
days inactive
8296
days old
1 comments
2 participants
tags (0)
participants (2)
-
Jeff Mincy -
Steve Youngs