Gerald Gutierrez <gutier(a)intergate.bc.ca> writes in xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org:
Hi all.
I've used GNU Emacs practically forever and have only recently
tried
Lucid Emacs. I was fairly surprised by the many differences.
"Lucid Emacs" died over five year ago. For better or for worse, it is
XEmacs now.
Having read the FAQ file regarding the merging of the two projects,
I'd like to know something more about it. I realize that this is a
touchy subject but I would only like to know a few facts.
1) Is there discussion in place about a possible merge?
No.
2) Is there a possibility of an "XEmacs takeover" like with
egcs/gcc?
No.
3) Is there a reason why XEmacs authors haven't signed over the
copyright to the FSF if their code is intended to be under the GPL?
The major sticking point that caused separation was the fact that
Richard was not satisfied with the way Sun handled the GPL-ization of
the code they sponsored in Lucid Emacs and XEmacs. This cannot have
been the real reason because the Mule code he has been adding to Emacs
20 isn't FSF copyright assigned and will never be FSF copyright
assigned. Since it is entirely owned by a non-US government I
sincerely doubt he has any legal recourse whatsoever in a US court
should the situation change (unlike with a US corporation like Sun
Microsystems) and according to what I've been told here, he doesn't
have legal recourse in a Japanese court either.
Since when it suits his purposes, he uses non-FSF copyright assigned
code, I fail to see why I should care, so long as I am using GPL'ed
code.
4) Is GNU Emacs development still taking place, or is it again more
or
less like the egcs/gcc deal where GNU Emacs is just slowing down
more and more?
Yes, no. At the moment they are busy reimplementing the XEmacs
redisplay engine (incompatibly of course).