Moving back to xemacs-beta; these technical details are of general interest. Mats Lidell writes: Well, I certainly agree that correctness is important. However, my personal position remains the same. I cannot evaluate the necessity of the patch to XEmacs.rules without the updated package. If it's possible to actually use the package, but it's "maybe" missing some autoloads, then there's nothing to stop a commit of the package except yours and Uwe's unwillingness to do so. You can always use a CVS branch, you know, if you want to limit checkouts to people who explicitly ask for it. _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta