Ar an chéad lá de mí na Nollaig, scríobh Stephen J. Turnbull: It *may* be inflooping, now you mention it. We were seeing XEmacs taking 94% of the CPU at random, but more often without -vanilla. At that point lldb wasn’t working for me because I wasn’t in the admin group, so I couldn’t work out exactly where it was. Jeremy Huddleston, in that bug, says he backed out your patch in March 2012. It might well be that this is the first Apple X11 release I’ve seen since that was done. Restarting gnuserv kills it. Screen is not dead, rather the XEmacs process running within it is not responsive, neither to TTY input via screen, nor to GNUserv input, until I execute the above code within the debugger. The XEmacs within the TTY wakes up immediately when i do that. I’ll rebuild without X11 support (my big project at the moment is editing an OCRed scan of a Persian-English dictionary, so the TTY is where I’m spending most of my time) and see if it goes away, which is what your bug suggests it should do. -- ‘Liston operated so fast that he once accidentally amputated an assistant’s fingers along with a patient’s leg, […] The patient and the assistant both died of sepsis, and a spectator reportedly died of shock, resulting in the only known procedure with a 300% mortality.’ (Atul Gawande, NEJM, 2012) _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta