Per Abrahamsen <abraham(a)dina.kvl.dk> writes:
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> writes:
> Per Abrahamsen <abraham(a)dina.kvl.dk> writes:
>
> > Inge did propose the new functions on the xemacs-beta list. I don't
> > think he received any (useful) feedback.
>
> He did, but most of it boiled down to noone being moved enough to
> implement them.
That's not what I consider useful. What would be useful would be
comments about the API. Was it implementable in XEmacs? Did it
suck?
Those are not useful questions. Yes, it was implementable and no, it
didn't suck, but I, for one, didn't find much value in those
enhancements. Definitely not useful enough value to give a shot at
implementing them.
> Inge didn't care about implementing them, so they didn't
get done.
For obvious reasons, easymenu is more important on Emacs than on
XEmacs. I think what one reasonable can expect of Emacs
programmers, is that they try to coordinate changes in the API with
the XEmacs people. Not that they actually implement them
themselves.
Just like FSF Emacs, XEmacs is a volunteer project. If noone cares to
code something up, it won't get done. But you know that.
--
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
What is mind? No matter.
What is matter? Never mind.