slower and slower perl parse on UNIX, not PC
- First Post
- Replies
- Stats
-
Go to
- ----- 2025 -----
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2024 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2013 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2012 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2011 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2010 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2009 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2008 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2007 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2006 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2005 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2004 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2003 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2002 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2001 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2000 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1999 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1998 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
I have built betas in the 21.5 series for Solaris and the PC since about .12
After .25, I have given up trying to edit Perl in the Solaris version.
I now use the PC version exclusively now that our disks at work are on
a SAN reachable by both the PCs and UNIX.
Loading modules of considerable size (6000 lines) take 30 to 45
seconds to load, completely on the Solaris version, five to seven
seconds under PC, accessing the same disks.
The delay in both versions is at the point where the Fontifying
(rexexps) is displayed in the progress meter.
Why would the Solaris version be so much slower? What data can I
provide (aside from the usual bug report stuff) to help fiogure this
out? Is there a way to get a dump of what lisp is being executed upon
file load? Is there a particular portion of the M I should be FR-ing?
Thanks
--
Matthew O. Persico
>>>> "Matthew" == Matthew Persico
<matthew.persico(a)gmail.com> writes:
Matthew> The delay in both versions is at the point where the
Matthew> Fontifying (rexexps) is displayed in the progress meter.
Matthew> Why would the Solaris version be so much slower?
AFAIK the regexp and font-lock code are identical in both versions (of
course the Lisp is, but both modules are highly dependent on C support
so there's a possibility of difference.)
Are you building with Mule? Er, scratch that, just send the usual bug
report for both platforms. Thanks!
Also, try nuking the progress meter, which is a substantially
different implementation and known to be very buggy on X11.
(setq progress-feedback-use-echo-area t)
--
School of Systems and Information Engineering http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
On 6/28/06, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
>>>>> "Matthew" == Matthew Persico
<matthew.persico(a)gmail.com> writes:
Matthew> The delay in both versions is at the point where the
Matthew> Fontifying (rexexps) is displayed in the progress meter.
Matthew> Why would the Solaris version be so much slower?
AFAIK the regexp and font-lock code are identical in both versions (of
course the Lisp is, but both modules are highly dependent on C support
so there's a possibility of difference.)
Are you building with Mule?
No, I'm Mule-less.
Er, scratch that, just send the usual bug
report for both platforms. Thanks!
No, thank you!
Should I send each one separately to the usual place, with the same
subject to coordinate them, or combine them and post here?
Also, try nuking the progress meter, which is a substantially
different implementation and known to be very buggy on X11.
(setq progress-feedback-use-echo-area t)
No difference - still molasses-slow.
--
Matthew O. Persico
6874
days inactive
6876
days old
2 comments
2 participants
tags (0)
participants (2)
-
Matthew Persico -
Stephen J. Turnbull