"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org&gt; writes: Stephen, I completely agree with your concerns. However, in this case what works for me is: 1. Add a trivial change to the regexps in `inversion-decoders'. The change is trivial, because as you say beta and patch versions are mutually exclusive. [mod: done] 2. Cross fingers that this was the only road bump in getting CEDET/XEmacs-21.5 to work again. [mod: apparently it is not] 3. Have a closer look at inversion.el and see how things can be implemented using native XEmacs features. BTW, my original question (whether beta and patch could be non-nil at the same time) applies either way. And again, the changes will be much more straight forward because of your answer. Regards Marcus _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta