2:32 p.m.
Hello
After a some discussion I think the best idea is to map
oei --> œi and oeu --> œu
However how to I do this
I tried
(quail-define-rules
("oei" ?œi)
or
("oeu" ?œ?u)
)
But it does not work
All the time I obtain
oei gives just œ
Etc
What shall I doo?
Uwe Brauer
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
6:07 p.m.
On 2008-11-24, Uwe Brauer <oub(a)mat.ucm.es> wrote:
However how to I do this
I tried
(quail-define-rules
("oei" ?œi)
or
("oeu" ?œ?u)
)
Quail says that it maps an input string to a character or string,
not to a list of characters.
Did you try
("oei" "œi")
?
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
2:36 p.m.
>>>> "Julian" == Julian Bradfield
<jcb+xeb(a)jcbradfield.org> writes:
On 2008-11-24, Uwe Brauer <oub(a)mat.ucm.es> wrote:
Quail says that it maps an input string to a character or string,
not to a list of characters.
Did you try
("oei" "œi")
Didn't you see Stephen's answer and my response?
Only
("oei" ["œi"])
worked, however now do gives doo
which is terrible!
Uwe
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
3:36 p.m.
Uwe Brauer writes:
Didn't you see Stephen's answer and my response?
No, he didn't. He got spam-trapped, and I only let it out a few
minutes ago. Sorry for the confusion.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
5:48 p.m.
New subject: french =?utf-8?B?xZM=?=: only oei --> =?utf-8?B?xZM=?=i and oeu --> =?utf-8?B?xZM=?=u
Ar an séú lá is fiche de mí na Samhain, scríobh Uwe Brauer:
>>>>> "Julian" == Julian Bradfield
<jcb+xeb(a)jcbradfield.org> writes:
> On 2008-11-24, Uwe Brauer <oub(a)mat.ucm.es> wrote:
> Quail says that it maps an input string to a character or string,
> not to a list of characters. Did you try ("oei" "œi")
Didn't you see Stephen's answer and my response?
Only
("oei" ["œi"])
worked, however now do gives doo
which is terrible!
Try
("oe" ["oe"
"œ"])
That way it’ll map to "oe" by default, but the user can hit 2 to select œ.
--
¿Dónde estará ahora mi sobrino Yoghurtu Nghé, que tuvo que huir
precipitadamente de la aldea por culpa de la escasez de rinocerontes?
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
6:16 p.m.
New subject: french œ: only oei --> œ i and oeu --> œu
Uwe Brauer writes:
I tried
(quail-define-rules
("oei" ?œi)
or
("oeu" ?œ?u) )
But it does not work
The syntax of quail-define-rules is a bit baroque. Try
(quail-define-rules
("oei" "œi")
("oeu" "œu") )
I don't think this will work, instead you'll get prompted for ?œ OR
?i, not the string concatenating them. More likely to work is
(quail-define-rules
("oei" ["œi"])
("oeu" ["œu"]) )
HTH
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
9:25 a.m.
New subject: french œ: only oei --> œ i and oeu --> œu
>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen J Turnbull
<stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
>
> But it does not work
The syntax of quail-define-rules is a bit baroque. Try
(quail-define-rules
("oei" "œi")
("oeu" "œu") )
I don't think this will work, instead you'll get prompted for
?œ OR
?i, not the string concatenating them. More likely to work is
Right it does not work
(quail-define-rules
("oei" ["œi"])
("oeu" ["œu"]) )
That works but now there is a new problem which let me think that the
whole approach is maybe faulty.
When I type (using french prefix) does it produces dooes
that is all o get doubled. The only possibility is to wait abnormally
long (5 sec.) Can anybody please check this??
It has nothing to do whether
modifier-keys-are-sticky are nil or t.
Uwe
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
9:40 a.m.
New subject: not in GNU 23 (was: french œ: only oei --> œ i and oeu --> œu)
>>>> "Uwe" == Uwe Brauer <oub(a)mat.ucm.es>
writes:
>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen J Turnbull
<stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
> I don't think this will work, instead you'll get prompted
for ?œ OR
> ?i, not the string concatenating them. More likely to work is
Right it does not work
> (quail-define-rules
> ("oei" ["œi"])
> ("oeu" ["œu"]) )
That works but now there is a new problem which let me think that
the
whole approach is maybe faulty.
When I type (using french prefix) does it produces dooes
that is all o get doubled. The only possibility is to wait abnormally
long (5 sec.) Can anybody please check this??
It has nothing to do whether
modifier-keys-are-sticky are nil or t.
I just want to add this odd problem does not occur in GNU emacs 23
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
5839
days inactive
5842
days old
7 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Aidan Kehoe -
Julian Bradfield -
Stephen J. Turnbull -
Uwe Brauer