* Daniel Pittman <daniel(a)danann.net> writes:
*blink* Er, this may seem like a silly suggestion, but... have you
considered adding the needed UDP support to xemacs, rather than using
the external binary?
No that's not a silly suggestion, but it is one that I hadn't thought
of. I'll definitely give that some consideration.
--
|---<Regards, Steve Youngs>-----------[GnuPG KeyID: EFD82ED2]---|
| It's a funny thing about life; if you refuse to accept |
| anything but the best, you very often get it |
|-----------------------------<mailto:youngs_s@ozlinx.com.au>---|