SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org&gt; writes: As I said before, when you say that "easy menu is the official menu interface now", as well as when you replace every instance of add-menu-button/add-submenu with the appropriate easymenu calls, you are /de facto/ obsoleting the old calls, whether it is your intention or not. First, I don't see how it is any simpler. The "raw" add-menu-button looks simple enough for me. Simpler than easymenu, in fact. Second, Easymenu has bogus hard-coded behaviour. I often don't *want* the popup menus to be an identical copy of the menubar menus. Some things I do want, like creating buffer-local menubars (see VM or W3 for examples), do not appear to be possible. Of course, one could improve easymenu to allow all these things, but I don't see the use of such effort over enhancing our existing menubar code. I don't see a good reason to promote easymenu in that fashion. Currently XEmacs supports the new add-{submenu,menu-button} functions and the old add-menu. When an external package desires FSFmacs compatibility, it's free to use easymenu. -- Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr&gt; | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia --------------------------------+-------------------------------- Ooh, Granny, what a BIG belly-button you have!