Jari Aalto+mail emacs writes:
We only need to take a look at the number of people that are
supporting
Perl modules compared with the number of people supporting Emacs lisp
modules (and programs) and it's easy to calculate ratio of 50:1. Check
traffic in perl groups vs. Emacs.
Counting the people programming ELisp vs programming Perl is comparing
apples to oranges. The vast majority of emacs users simply use it,
and don't write ELisp at all.
In order to use Perl, you must be programming.
As to whether this is a good idea or not, I believe that this should
be something that is either a configure-time option, or a dll.
Which brings up a real question. What applications currently use Perl
as an extension language? I would like to know the advantages and
disadvantages of it.
If we had Perl as extension language, a vast number of potential
programmers might step in.
To what advantage? Most work that we need to do in XEmacs is in the C
or ELisp.
--
Colin