One quick thing. Kent Pitman has recomended that people stop referencing CLtL1 and CLtL2 and instead reference the ansi spec. Since that is quite expensive the next best thing online is the HyperSpec: http://www.harlequin.com/education/books/HyperSpec/FrontMatter/index.html I know that CLtLn make for good toilet reading, but its not a representation of the official spec. You may now return to your normal discourse. -Reggie -----Original Message----- From: owner-xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org [mailto:owner-xemacs-beta＠xemacs.org]On Behalf Of Jerry James Sent: Monday, July 13, 1998 5:44 PM To: xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org Subject: Re: scheme - my opinion On Mon, 13 Jul 1998 at 13:23:59 +0900 (JST), "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull(a)sk.tsukuba.ac.jp&gt; wrote: <delurk> Doesn't CLISP include some CLtL2 constructs? I seem to remember that it does. In that case, rather than sifting through the large CLtL1, you may need to dig through the enormous CLtL2. Fortunately for those of us who don't want to buy a copy, it can be accessed online here: <URL:http://www.cs.cmu.edu/Groups/AI/html/cltl/cltl2.html> The part about bits and fonts you mentioned above was removed for CLtL2, as documented here: <URL:http://www.cs.cmu.edu/Groups/AI/html/cltl/clm/node25.html> I don't know whether CLISP follows CLtL1 or CLtL2 in this case. </delurk> -- Jerry James Email: jerry(a)cs.ucsb.edu WWW: http://www.cs.ucsb.edu/~jerry/