Re: minibuf.texi question

Wednesday, 22 December 1999

        Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch&gt; writes:

...
 Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)iskon.hr&gt; writes:

 > Okay, I withdraw the above sentence ("I don't see the point...").
 > But I maintain that the fact that the features are named the same
 > and similar in nature is bound to create confusion among the
 > (Lisp) users.

 Why? The DEFAULT argument is what to return if the user pressed RET. 
You're right.  I've overlooked the fact that their DEFAULT argument
also worked that way.

So I agree that adding the DEFAULT arguments to other functions is
fine.  We can implement the M-n magic when we see fit and it won't
break anything.

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998