SY> [ Moved to -beta ] SY> |--==> "WD" == Will Deakin <w.deakin(a)pindar.com&gt; writes: WD> The changes the root directory makefile look fine to me. WD> Adrian Aichner wrote: WD> I would say yes. WD> I'm not so sure about some of the other changes for fairly obvious WD> reasons: I am trying to keep ilisp and the ilisp xemacs package in WD> sync. Life is much easier if changes are made that are not xemacs WD> specific. This has many advantages -- if any problems are fixed in the WD> ilisp or xemacs packages I can easily apply them. Which is a win-win WD> situation. WD> Although, there files that *must* be xemacs specific, such as the top WD> level makefile, I would prefer to keep these to a minimun, if WD> possible. This minimises the number of files that need to be WD> maintained separately and potentially get wrong. WD> I would appreciate any thoughts on this matter, SY> Would it be possible to wrap the XEmacs specific parts of doc/Makefile SY> in a test for the presence of XEmacs.rules? Would that be acceptable, SY> Will? SY> Adrian, if Will's OK with this idea, can you take care of it? Good idea. How about that Will? SY> -- SY> |---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 10D5C9C5>---| SY> | XEmacs - It's not just an editor. | SY> | It's a way of life. | SY> |------------------------------------&lt;youngs(a)xemacs.org&gt;---| -- Adrian Aichner mailto:adrian＠xemacs.org http://www.xemacs.org/