2:52 p.m.
>>>> "Martin" == Martin Buchholz
<martin(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Martin> Why do I get the feeling this is an XEmacs bug, and as such shouldn't
Martin> really be in PROBLEMS (which are about _other_ peoples' bugs).
I'm not qualified to answer this. :-(
Ray> -There have been reports of Sun sed truncating very long lines in the
Ray> +There have been reports of Sun sed truncating very lines in the
Martin> Huh? How did this sneak in?
It's a typo in the original PROBLEMS file for sed on Solaris 2.5.
(And I used to have this problem on 2.5.)
Ray
3:44 p.m.
New subject: Anyone using b39 non-Solaris + SIGIO + widgets + Motif?
Raymond Toy <toy(a)rtp.ericsson.se> writes:
>>>>> "Martin" == Martin Buchholz
<martin(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Martin> Why do I get the feeling this is an XEmacs bug, and as
Martin> such shouldn't really be in PROBLEMS (which are about
Martin> _other_ peoples' bugs).
I'm not qualified to answer this. :-(
There's always the question: does the bug happen in 21.1? If not,
it's very likely an XEmacs bug.
As such, I don't have anything against documenting it in PROBLEMS,
which is as good a place for it as any, but we should indicate that in
this case the bug is with us and not with Sun's Motif.
4:02 p.m.
New subject: Anyone using b39 non-Solaris + SIGIO + widgets + Motif?
At 16:44 18/01/01 +0100, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Raymond Toy <toy(a)rtp.ericsson.se> writes:
> >>>>> "Martin" == Martin Buchholz <martin(a)xemacs.org>
writes:
>
> Martin> Why do I get the feeling this is an XEmacs bug, and as
> Martin> such shouldn't really be in PROBLEMS (which are about
> Martin> _other_ peoples' bugs).
>
> I'm not qualified to answer this. :-(
There's always the question: does the bug happen in 21.1? If not,
it's very likely an XEmacs bug.
Its related to widget use - which obviously aren't a 21.1 feature.
As such, I don't have anything against documenting it in
PROBLEMS,
which is as good a place for it as any, but we should indicate that in
this case the bug is with us and not with Sun's Motif.
andy
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Andy Piper
Principal Consultant, BEA Systems Ltd
7:24 a.m.
New subject: Anyone using b39 non-Solaris + SIGIO + widgets + Motif?
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Raymond Toy <toy(a)rtp.ericsson.se> writes:
> >>>>> "Martin" == Martin Buchholz <martin(a)xemacs.org>
writes:
>
> Martin> Why do I get the feeling this is an XEmacs bug, and as
> Martin> such shouldn't really be in PROBLEMS (which are about
> Martin> _other_ peoples' bugs).
There's always the question: does the bug happen in 21.1? If not,
it's very likely an XEmacs bug.
And also the question: suppose we face an inconsistency / bug in
third-party code, and suppose we can write a workaround, but we don't. Do we
consider this an XEmacs bug ?
--
/ / _ _ Didier Verna http://www.inf.enst.fr/~verna/
- / / - / / /_/ / EPITA / LRDE mailto:didier＠lrde.epita.fr
/_/ / /_/ / /__ / 14-16 rue Voltaire Tel. +33 (1) 53 14 59 47
94276 Kremlin-Bicêtre cedex Fax. +33 (1) 44 08 01 99
8:52 a.m.
New subject: Anyone using b39 non-Solaris + SIGIO + widgets + Motif?
>>>> "drv" == Didier Verna
<didier(a)xemacs.org> writes:
drv> And also the question: suppose we face an
drv> inconsistency / bug in third-party code, and suppose we can
drv> write a workaround, but we don't. Do we consider this an
drv> XEmacs bug ?
If it's in the OS, yes. Otherwise, we could just tell people to throw
away the 24 karat solid bug called NT, and save lots of effort. ;-)
It really depends on the bug, and whether it's likely to go away. For
example, libX11 regularly assumes that you will not pass illegal
parameters to functions where what's "legal" is nowhere documented.
This is not going to go away.
If we know how to work around one of those and don't, it's our bug.
--
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091
_________________ _________________ _________________ _________________
What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules."
9:46 a.m.
New subject: Anyone using b39 non-Solaris + SIGIO + widgets + Motif?
At 08:24 22/01/01 +0100, Didier Verna wrote:
And also the question: suppose we face an inconsistency / bug
in
third-party code, and suppose we can write a workaround, but we don't. Do we
consider this an XEmacs bug ?
I would gladly write a workaround if I had a clue what was going on.
andy
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Andy Piper
Principal Consultant, BEA Systems Ltd
8517
days inactive
8521
days old
5 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Andy Piper -
Andy Piper -
Didier Verna -
Hrvoje Niksic -
Raymond Toy -
Stephen J. Turnbull