Didier Verna <verna(a)inf.enst.fr> writes:
> > I meant that if I need Motif to write a CDE-unaware
application, I
> > shouldn't have to find the lib in a CDE specific diretory,
>
> Then think of /usr/dt/lib of a directory containing Motif.
I don't want to think that way. It's bogus.
You still haven't named one problem with it.
> That's what it is, as far as XEmacs is concerned. You could
make
> the same claim about /usr/openwin/lib being an "abomination".
No because Openwin is Sun's specific X11, but you can always install
the X consortium one on your machine too (I have both). People
expect graphics libraries to reside in an X11 directory. The Athena
libs are there. Motif should be there. How a guy unaware of CDE
could have the idea of looking for Motif in a directory called dt ?!
By experience? By reading a manual? What kind of a question is that?
> > Please read the whole thread on the subject. There has
been
> > further comments on this.
>
> The thread has mostly been useless, everyone agreeing about
> /usr/dt/ being an "abomination," without stating their exact
> problem with it.
nyanyanya. I perfectly understood everybody.
What is your problem, Didier?
--
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Free software is just like Communism, except it actually works.