Re: Experimental implementation of extent modification hooks

Monday, 7 September 1998

        Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr&gt; writes:

...
 This patch is *not* meant for application to any XEmacs. 
So I didn't and just looked at the patch :-) These are just some
stupid remarks. I cannot say anything other about the implementation
other than it looks surprisingly simple.

...
 	* insdel.c (signal_before_change): Don't check for Armageddon.

Why? Or is Armageddon gone totally now?
...
 +  /* #### It's a shame that we can't use any of the existing
run_hook*
 +     functions here.  This is so because all of them work with
 +     symbols, to be able to retrieve default values of local hooks.
 +     <sigh> */ 
Shouldn't that be changed then? 

Jan

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998