Re: INLINE: wtf?

Wednesday, 13 May 1998

        Martin Buchholz <martin(a)xemacs.org&gt; writes:

...
 The particular case of digit_to_number is sad.  Inlining the
 function always saves code size AND execution time, so gcc should
 inline it with -O2. 
I don't think gcc should inline any function with -O2.

...
 Project: You could write a program to determine all static functions
 in XEmacs that are called only once.  Then add inline to their
 function definitions. 
What would this buy us, exactly?  I may have some free time, but not
*that* much free time!  :-)

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr&gt; | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Try to use "ad nauseam" at least once per flame. It doesn't mean
anything; but it gives that polished feel to your postings.

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998