Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch> wrote:
Didier Verna <didier(a)xemacs.org> writes:
> The problem is that in XEmacs, the way to specify a background pixmap is
> hacky:
No it isn't. All the area of an XEmacs frame is conceptually covered
by the default face.
Yes, and IMO this is a broken concept. That's why I said it is
"hacky". However, this:
That is why the background color is a default face property and not a
frame
property.
is perfectly fine. All faces can have a background[-pixmap] or whatever. What
is hacky is that you have to make a special case (and treatment) of the
default face background[-pixmap] because it is used as a background attribute
for something which is not related to characters. We should have a
background[-pixmap] specifier.
--
/ / _ _ Didier Verna
http://www.inf.enst.fr/~verna/
- / / - / / /_/ / EPITA / LRDE mailto:didier@epita.fr
/_/ / /_/ / /__ / 14-16 rue Voltaire Tel. +33 (1) 44 08 01 77
94276 Kremlin-Bicêtre cedex Fax. +33 (1) 44 08 01 99