Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch> writes:
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> writes:
> > The behavior now may be correct, but that doesn't mean it can't be
> > improved. (I can think of several options: for example, defining a
> > key to be 'undefined could override the value of
> > retry-undefined-key-binding-unshifted, or the value of this variable
> > could be "local" to each keymap.
>
> Yes, that would be useful indeed. Like a "keymap property". Except
> that it's non-trivial to do, because keymaps actually hold subkeymaps,
> and the property should be propagated correctly.
What is wrong with the "if explicitly bound to 'undefined do not do
the lookup' solutions?
Nothing, I hope. To quote a woman, keymap.c is shpxvat whznawv.