>>>> Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)xemacs.org> writes:
greg(a)itasoftware.com (Greg Klanderman) writes:
> --- mail-abbrevs.el.bak Wed Dec 3 20:43:47 2003
> +++ mail-abbrevs.el Wed Dec 3 20:44:12 2003
> @@ -607,7 +607,8 @@
> (if (and (looking-at "[ \t]*\n")
> (= (char-syntax (preceding-char)) ?w))
> (expand-abbrev))
> - (next-line (or arg 1)))
> + (next-line (or arg 1))
> + (setq this-command 'next-line))
Looks good to me. Maybe we should add a short comment, so that
someone who looks at the code later doesn't wonder, "what the hell is
this here for?" Something like
;; because line-move checks last-command
would be more than enough.
Hi Hrvoje!
agreed.. should I re-submit an updated patch or can the
applier just append that comment?
thanks,
Greg