SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org> writes:
> Why don't you release a giflib lite that knows only how to
read GIFs,
> not write them? Then you could wash your hands off the full version,
> until the dust settles.
I don't believe that resolves the patent problem.
I thought only the compression (i.e. GIF creation) was patented?
I also don't think it would matter if a copy of giflib got
magically
posted on Usenet via an anonymous remailer.
Oh. :-(
Maybe now _is_ a good time to convert all our GIFs to PNGs. The
(potential) lack of GIF support is going to hurt W3 though.
Yup.
--
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
main(){printf(&unix["\021%six\012\0"],(unix)["have"]+"fun"-0x60);}