I just wanted to make sure this bug fix didn't get lost in the shuffle. I
apologize for the duplicate but I never heard back after sending it in last
time.
Show replies by date
gshapiro> I just wanted to make sure this bug fix didn't get lost in the
gshapiro> shuffle. I apologize for the duplicate but I never heard back
gshapiro> after sending it in last time.
gshapiro> The problem is that sc-attribs-emailname calls
gshapiro> sc-attribs-%@-addresses which simply matches the first string
gshapiro> which contains legal e-mail address characters. It uses the full
gshapiro> sender string, e.g. "Gregory Neil Shapiro
gshapiro> <gshapiro(a)sendmail.org>". In that case, the first string is
gshapiro> "Gregory". This makes the "emailname" attribute useless
as it is
gshapiro> the same as "firstname".
After comparing the original supercite with the xemacs version, I think I
found the real problem. The "delim" parameter is being ignored by
sc-attribs-%@-addresses. A new patch:
--- supercite.el~orig Sat Mar 27 18:06:20 1999
+++ supercite.el Sat Aug 28 01:48:28 1999
@@ -1009,7 +1009,7 @@
called with DELIM \"@\". If DELIM is nil or not provided, matches
addresses of the style ``name''."
;; Handle X.400 addresses where G & S fields contain the sender name.
- (if (string-match "/[GS]=\\([-a-zA-Z0-9_.]+\\)\\|\\([-+a-zA-Z0-9_.]+\\)"
from)
+ (if (string-match (concat
"/[GS]=\\([-a-zA-Z0-9_.]+\\)\\|\\([-+a-zA-Z0-9_.]+\\)" delim) from)
(if (match-beginning 2)
(substring from (match-beginning 2) (match-end 2))
(substring from (match-beginning 1) (match-end 1)))))