Glynn Clements <glynn(a)sensei.co.uk> writes in xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org:
...
I don't have canna here, but I would expect the following to
provide
the previous behaviour (but without affecting other packages):
...
This isn't quite right, but it's close enough that I think I found a
usable fix. Patch posted to xemacs-patches and xemacs-mule, thanks.