David Bush <david.bush(a)adn.alcatel.com> writes:
Hrvoje Niksic writes:
> Didier Verna <verna(a)inf.enst.fr> writes:
>
> > BTW: we're in the process of upgrading to gcc 2.8 these days. Does
> > any of you guys know problems for compiling XEmacs with gcc 2.8 on
> > solaris 2.5 ?
>
> I've been using Gcc 2.8 for some time without problem -- that's
> Solaris 2.6.
>
> Note that XEmacs will not compile on a patched-up Solaris 2.5.1
> because Dynodump doesn't build there. That problem is not specific to
> Gcc, though.
What do you mean by "patched-up" in this context?
I mean "with all the recommended patches installed". At least, that's
what my sysadmin told me when I asked him what changed on the machine
between then and the day before.
Also, that's what people reported on comp.emacs.xemacs.