David Bush <david.bush(a)adn.alcatel.com> writes:
 Hrvoje Niksic writes:
  > Didier Verna <verna(a)inf.enst.fr> writes:
  > 
  > > BTW: we're in the process of upgrading to gcc 2.8 these days. Does
  > > any of you guys know problems for compiling XEmacs with gcc 2.8 on
  > > solaris 2.5 ?
  > 
  > I've been using Gcc 2.8 for some time without problem -- that's
  > Solaris 2.6.
  > 
  > Note that XEmacs will not compile on a patched-up Solaris 2.5.1
  > because Dynodump doesn't build there.  That problem is not specific to 
  > Gcc, though.
 
 What do you mean by "patched-up" in this context? 
I mean "with all the recommended patches installed".  At least, that's 
what my sysadmin told me when I asked him what changed on the machine
between then and the day before.
Also, that's what people reported on comp.emacs.xemacs.