Martin Buchholz wrote:
For the 3rd day in a row I was asked a random question with an answer
that should have been in our list of lisp packages, and again I got
inspired to do some link farming.
As I threatened to do earlier, I commented out the Elisp Archive link
from the standard margin on all the web pages and marked the link to
it in elispPackages.html as obsolete. Does anyone think the Elisp
Archive is still useful, except as an historical record?
Yes. The elispPackages page contains links to the current version of
ilisp, whilst the package that is installed via the xemacs package
system is somewhat out of date.
[In discussion with the current ilisp maintainers I have voluteered to
look at packagaing the current version of ilisp but I am not sure how to
go about this]
Best Regards,
Will Deakin
**********************************************************************
This email and its attachments are intended for the above
named only and may be confidential. If they have come to
you in error, you must take no action based on them, nor
must you copy or show them to anyone; please reply to this
email and highlight the error.
Security Warning: Please note that this email has been
created in the knowledge that the internet email is not a
100% secure communications medium. We advise that you
understand and observe this lack of security when emailing us.
Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this
email and attachments are free from any virus, we advise
that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient
should ensure they are actually virus free.
If you have received this email in error please notify:
postmaster(a)pindar.com
**********************************************************************