Andreas Jaeger <aj(a)arthur.rhein-neckar.de> writes in xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org:
>>>>> Jan Vroonhof writes:
...
Jan> Yes, and therefore XEmacs uses glibc 2.x's implementation of it instead
Jan> of using its own. That is different in FSF Emacs isn't it?
No. FSF Emacs 20.3 uses the same logic as XEmacs does (the patches
have been ported from FSF Emacs to XEmacs) - and that confuses me
since it breaks on FSF Emacs but works without problems on my system.
No, it doesn't. I copied most of the code, but I did not copy the
part that unconditionally disabled mmap for allocation. Instead, I
forced mmap allocation off before dump, when it is absolutely unsafe,
and I forced the use of minimal tag bits so that it could be used
after dump. This code has had very heavy testing by me and many
others for 15 months now. I am fairly confident about its stability.
I guess we can ignore the patch for XEmacs - as long as nobody
encounters this problem with XEmacs.
We can, I suppose. voodoo_free_hook is ugly, but it works. What we
really want is to not dump at all. What's the current status of
getting rid of dumping?
--
I protest the NATO war in Yugoslavia.