[comp.unix.solaris] Re: free solaris licenses; benchmark restriction - XEmacs-Beta - XEmacs Mailing List Archives

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

[comp.unix.solaris] Re: free solaris licenses; benchmark restriction

Re: [comp.unix.solaris] Re: free...

Re: [failure] 21.0-b53 compilation...

Mark Borges

Thursday, 20 August 1998 Thu, 20 Aug '98

10:42 p.m.

(permalink)

Wouldn't 21.0 be better? I don't think workshop-5.0 is intending to ship RSN. The first beta, err early access, was just released not too long ago.

Attachments:

attachment.mht (message/rfc822 — 52 bytes)

Reply

Show replies by date

Martin Buchholz

Thursday, 20 August Thu, 20 Aug

11:02 p.m.

(permalink)

>>>> "Mark" == Mark Borges <mdb(a)cdc.noaa.gov> writes:

Mark> Wouldn't 21.0 be better? I don't think workshop-5.0 is intending to Mark> ship RSN. The first beta, err early access, was just released not too Mark> long ago. XEmacs 20.4 was (and still is) my recommendation. XEmacs 21.0 will need some time to become stable. The folks on xemacs-beta (and myself, of course) can be bleeding edge, but in the Real World people should stick with 20.4 for a while. XEmacs 20.4 is a damn fine editor. Martin

Reply

9596

days inactive

9596

days old

xemacs-beta@xemacs.org

Manage subscription

1 comments

2 participants

tags (0)

participants (2)

Mark Borges
Martin Buchholz