Michael Sperber <sperber(a)informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes in
xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org:
>>>>> "sb" == SL Baur
<steve(a)xemacs.org> writes:
sb> 1. My decision to base primary package
searching off of $prefix appears
sb> to be have a suboptimal one, but probably too late to fix for 21.0.
Could you elaborate? I seem to've missed something, and this
sounds
as if it affects my code.
I'm not sure I fully like the package-path hard-coding from $prefix.
It makes it somewhat difficult to transport binaries. Fortunately the
relative path searching appears quite adequate.
sb> Footnotes:
sb> [1] Michael, when is the next update of EFS scheduled?
Just prior to the 21.0 release, and I had the exact same issues in
mind as you.
O.K.
All changes I've been accumulating have been pretty minor, so
I've
been hesitant cutting another release before it became necessary..
Just curious, but will this have the dired manual broken out into its
own file in the dired package?