On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org&gt;wrote: Ok. I'll try that out soon. However, I decided to byte-compile the file and found out that there are quite a few undefined things like: While compiling eldoc-message: ** variable message-log-max bound but not referenced While compiling eldoc-display-message-no-interference-p: ** reference to free variable edebug-active While compiling eldoc-beginning-of-sexp: ** variable err bound but not referenced ** variable err bound but not referenced While compiling eldoc-symbol-function: ** variable err bound but not referenced While compiling the end of the data: ** The following functions are not known to be defined: help-split-fundoc, string-match-p, help-function-arglist Despite these, eldoc works just fine for me with slime (which is all I ever use eldoc for). Also, on a somewhat related issue, what about adding slime as new package? It works fine with xemacs. I even volunteer to "maintain" it. :-) Well, once all of the package issues are straightened out, of course. Ray _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta