On Sat, Apr 05 2008, Mike Kupfer wrote:
>>>>> "Reiner" == Reiner Steib
<reinersteib+gmane(a)imap.cc> writes:
Reiner> Are the patches you mention already integrated upstream in the
Reiner> v5-10 branch?
Ah, good question. It doesn't look like this one is:
2007-03-05 Mike Kupfer <mike.kupfer(a)xemacs.org>
* lisp/gnus-spec.el (gnus-parse-simple-format): Add required 2nd
argument to (setq dontinsert), using the fix from the HEAD
branch at
gnus.org.
I suppose this is this patch?
2004-01-27 Jerry James <james(a)xemacs.org> (tiny change)
* gnus-spec.el (gnus-parse-simple-format): Fix setq value
omission.
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
--- gnus-spec.el 5 Jan 2004 19:47:22 -0000 7.2
+++ gnus-spec.el 27 Jan 2004 05:55:53 -0000 7.3
@@ -665,7 +665,7 @@
(list (car flist)))
;; A single number.
((string= fstring "%d")
- (setq dontinsert)
+ (setq dontinsert t)
(if insert
(list `(princ ,(car flist)))
(list `(int-to-string ,(car flist)))))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Hm, (setq dontinsert) is the same as (setq dontinsert nil) in Emacs.
OTOH, setting dontinsert to nil is a no-op here.
I don't see this one, either. I don't know if Aidan has
approached
someone on the Gnus team about it yet.
No. In the form discussed in
<
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.xemacs.patches/8878> it's not
suitable for inclusion since it would break on Emacs.
I didn't look in CVS, but Katsumi Yamaoka said the third patch
(or
something equivalent) is in the v5-10 branch (see
http://calypso.tux.org/pipermail/xemacs-patches/2008-March/001531.html).
I don't know how you solved the problem in XEmacs, but I'd suggest to
check if you can use Katsumi Yamaoka's approach instead of a different
one.
Though I keep forgetting about that pesky issue of compatible GPL
versions. That could delay things. :-(
Didn't you (XEmacs) decide to switch to GPLv3 as well? I seem to
recall Steven wrote something like this recently.
Reiner> So the answer to your question [1] is "yes".
Okay, great! I guess this means I ought to get on the ding list.
You may read the list via Gmane (gmane.emacs.gnus.general).
Non-subscriber postings are subject to moderation.
http://gnus.org/distribution.html says I should mail Lars to get
write access to CVS; is that still the right thing for me to do?
For getting write access, it's the right thing to write to Lars. If
you just want to add a tag, it might not be worth the effort. Someone
else (e.g. me) could do it on your request. On a second thought, if
you only sync with upstream releases, we don't really need
xemacs-pkg-* tags because it would be the same as the v5-10-* release
tag.
Bye, Reiner.
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available |
http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta