I am reading this remote so I cannot check all the details.
Andreas Jaeger <aj(a)suse.de> writes:
Btw. just run `nm xemacs |grep malloc_hook' on the binary after
applying
my other patch - we really don't need malloc_hook if DOUG_LEA_MALLOC
is used.
Is there a documented guarantee this will never be needed? I'll happy
to take your word for glibc related things, but isn't it is possible
that for instance the gcc folk could decide to set it in libgcc.a? Or
should I take your comment to mean that glic's malloc doesn't use the
hook at all?
Is the version in Debian potato an official released version. If not
would it may be better just to make this patch when there is actually
a version with this problem released?
Jan
P.S. I am interpreting your patch correctly as saying glibc doesn't
actually define malloc_hook until after the first malloc.