portability?
Bill Tutt wrote:
> From: Ben Wing [mailto:ben@666.com]
[cool mappings yanked for space]
Ah, ok, then its most likely a simple 1-1 mapping based on the EUDC
CodeRange data in the registry. In which case you can't depend on a
hardwired mapping.
(HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Nls\CodePage\EUDCCodeRa
nge)
Is there any particular reason this method of encoding isn't a good enough
extension for unassigned UTF-16 safe ranges, or do you just not want to
bother touching the code when we discover the loads of alien races that are
out there?
Bill
--
Ben
In order to save my hands, I am cutting back on my mail. I also write
as succinctly as possible -- please don't be offended. If you send me
mail, you _will_ get a response, but please be patient, especially for
XEmacs-related mail. If you need an immediate response and it is not
apparent in your message, please say so. Thanks for your understanding.
See also
http://www.666.com/ben/typing.html.